FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF CONTROLLED RELEASE MUCOADHESIVE MATRIX TABLETS: ASSESSMENT OF MYRRH OLEO GUM RESIN AS A NATURAL PHARMACEUTICAL EXCIPIENT
Abstract
Mucoadhesive polymer owing to its binding capacity with gastric mucin prolongs the gastric residence time and thereby increased drug bioavailability. In the present study, oral controlled release mucoadhesive matrix tablets have been developed for domperidone as model drug using natural mucoadhesive material myrrh oleo gum resin (MOGR).The tablets were formulated with the natural polymer in different concentration (5, 10, 15 and 20 % w/w) employing direct compression technology. The prepared batches were evaluated for tablet parametric test (drug assay, diameter, thickness, hardness and tensile strength), swelling index, mucoadhesive strength (using texture analyser) and in vitro drug release studies. Accelerated stability studies were also conducted on all the prepared batches. The tensile strength increases from 0.973±0.09 to 1.687±0.11 MN/m2 and mucoadhesive strength from19.868 to 49.778 N with the increase in natural polymer concentration from 5 to 20 % (M1 to M4). Swelling index of natural polymer was testified towards proliferation by together increasing gum concentration and the time period. The release kinetic and mechanism of release were calculated by fitting in vitro release data in various models demonstrating that release follows zero order and Hixson Crowell cube root law. The release exponent (n) ranges in between 0.5889 to 0.7389 indicating multiple release mechanisms possibly the combination of diffusion and erosion. Accelerated stability studies demonstrate no significant change in the tensile strength, mucoadhesive strength and drug assay. These research outcomes clearly specify the potential of MOGR to be used as binder, release retardant and mucoadhesive natural material in tablet formulations.
Keywords:
Myrrh oleo gum resin, binder, release retardant, mucoadhesion, drug release mechanism.DOI
https://doi.org/10.25004/IJPSDR.2011.030203References
2. Tripathi KD. Essential of Medical Pharmacology, New Delhi, India.Jaypeebrothers medical Publisher Ltd, 2008, pp. 639.
3. Deshpande AA, Rhodes CT, Shah NH, Malik AW. Controlled-Release Drug Delivery Systems for Prolonged Gastric Residence: an Overview. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.1996; 22:531–539.
4. Streubel A, Siepmann J, Bodmeier R. Drug Delivery to the Upper Small Intestine Window using Gastroretentive Technologies. Current Opin. Pharmacol.2006; 6:501–508.
5. Huntsberger JR.Treatise on adhesion and adhesives. (Ed. R Patrick), Vol. 1, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1967.
6. DerjaguinBV, Toporov YP, Mueler VM, Aleinikova IN. On the Relationship between the Electrostatic and the Molecular Component of the Adhesion of Elastic Particles to a Solid Surface. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1977; 58:528–533.
7. Kaelbe DH, MoacaninJ. A Surface Analysis of Bioadhesion. Polymer.1977; 18:475–481.
8. Kinlock AJ. The Science of Adhesion: I. Surface and Interfacial Aspects. J Mater Sci. 1980; 15:2141–2166.
9. KammerHW. Adhesion between Polymers. Acta Polym.1983; 34:112–118.
10. Peppas NA, Buri PA.Surface, Interfacial and Molecular Aspects of PolymerBioadhesion on Soft Tissues. J Control Release 1985; 2:257–275.
11. Voyutskii SS.Autohesion and Adhesion of High Polymers, Interscience, New York, NY, 1963.
12. Kumar P, Singh I. Evaluation of Oleo-Gum Resin as Directly Compressible Tablet Excipient and Release Retardant. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2010; 67:307-313.
13. Higuchi T. Rate of Release of Medicament from Ointment Bases Containing Drugs in Suspension.J Pharm Sci. 1961; 50:874-875.
14. Hixson AW, Crowell JH. Dependence of Reaction Velocity upon Surface and Agitation (I) Theoretical Consideration. Ind Eng Chem. 1931; 23:923-931.
15. Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, Peppas NA.Mechanisms of Solute Release from Porous Hydrophilic Polymers. Int. J. Pharm. 1983; 15:25-35.
16. Peppas NA. Analysis of Fickianand Non-FickianDrug Release from Polymers. Pharm Acta Helv.1985; 60: 110-111.
Published

