A COMPARATIVE DERMAL MICRODIALYSIS STUDY OF DICLOFENAC QPS VERSUS CONVENTIONAL 1% DICLOFENAC GEL

Authors

  • Sanjay Kumar H. Maroo Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Limited, Commerce House 1, Bodakdev, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Ketan R. Patel Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Limited, Commerce House 1, Bodakdev, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Vipul Prajapati Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Limited, Commerce House 1, Bodakdev, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Rajen Shah Raptim Research Ltd, A-226, TTC Industrial Area, Mahape MIDC, Navi Mumbai, India
  • Milind Bagul Raptim Research Ltd, A-226, TTC Industrial Area, Mahape MIDC, Navi Mumbai, India
  • Rakesh U. Ojha Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Limited, Commerce House 1, Bodakdev, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Abstract

The study was designed to evaluate penetration of diclofenac through skin after application of diclofenac 4 % quick penetrating solution (Dynapar QPS) versus conventional diclofenac 1% gel. In this 2 way crossover study, 6 male healthy human subjects were randomized to receive either 1 mg of diclofenac of the Dynapar QPS (25µl) or 1 mg of diclofenac from gel (100 mg) on to the marked area of the forearm three times daily for 3 days. On day 4, after 10th application, the dermal microdialysis was performed. The dialysate samples were collected every half an hour for 6 hours and diclofenac concentration was determined. Mean (± SD) Cmax after administration of Dynapar QPS was significantly higher as compared to diclofenac gel (11.10 ± 5.18μg/mL versus 2.34 ± 2.84 respectively, P = 0.0058). The time to reach Cmax was also lesser with Dynapar QPS as compared to diclofenac gel (1.5 ± 0.0 hrs versus 2.17 ± 1.29 respectively, P = 0.2617). The mean AUC0–t and AUC0-∞ after administration of Dynapar QPS was significantly higher as compared to Diclofenac gel (AUC0–t: 9.48 ± 4.76 hr.ng/mL versus 3.53 ± 4.22 respectively, P = 0.0125; AUC0-∞ : 10.82 ± 5.03 hr.ng/mL versus 4.74 ± 4.42 respectively, P = 0.0099). There was no statistical significant difference was found in all the secondary pharmacokinetic endpoints such as Tmax, elimination rate constant and T1/2 between both the treatment groups. Dynapar QPS provides higher penetration of diclofenac in underlying tissue as compared to diclofenac gel.

Keywords:

Quick penetrating solution, diclofenac 1%, diclofenac 4 %, dermal microdialysis

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25004/IJPSDR.2013.050408

References

1. Nair B, Taylor-Gjevre R. A Review of Topical Diclofenac Use in Musculoskeletal Disease. Pharmaceuticals. 2010; 3: 1892-1908.
2. Heyneman CA, Lawless-Liday C, Wall GC. Oral versus Topical NSAIDs in Rheumatic Disease. Drugs. 2000 ; 60: 555-574
3. Langman MJ. Ulcer complications associated with anti-inflammatory drug use. What is the extent of the disease burden?. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001; 10: 13–19.
4. Argoff CE, Gloth FM. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for management of osteoarthritis in long-term care patients. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2011; 7: 393–399.
5. Zhang W, Doherty M, Leeb BF, Alekseeva L, Arden N K, Bijlsma JW et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2007; 66: 377–388.
6. Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N et al. Osteoarticular Research Group. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008; 16: 137–162.
7. Rostom A, Moayyedi P, Hunt R. Canadian consensus guidelines on long-term nonsteroidal anti-nflammatory drug therapy and the need for gastroprotection: Benefits versus risks. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009; 29: 481–496.
8. Subedi RK, Oh SY, Chun MK, Choi HK. Recent advances in transdermal drug delivery. Arch Pharm Res. 2010; 33: 339-351.
9. Cevc G, Blume G. New, highly efficient formulation of diclofenac for the topical, transdermal administration in ultradeformable drug carriers, Transfersomes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001; 1514: 191-205.
10. Frech EJ, Go MF. Treatment and chemoprevention of NSAID-associated gastrointestinal complications. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009; 5: 65–73.
11. Towheed TE. Pennsaid therapy for osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Rheumatol. 2006; 33:567-573.
12. Roth SH, Shainhouse JZ. Efficacy and safety of a topical diclofenac solution (pennsaid) in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled clinical trial. Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164: 2017-2023.
13. Brunner M, Dehghanyar P, Seigfried B, Martin W, Menke G, Müller M. Favourable dermal penetration of diclofenac after administration to the skin using a novel spray gel formulation. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005; 60: 573-577.
14. Fuller P, Roth S. Diclofenac sodium topical solution with dimethyl sulfoxide, a viable alternative to oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories in osteoarthritis: review of current evidence. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2011; 4:223-231.

Published

01-10-2013
Statistics
Abstract Display: 441
PDF Downloads: 452
Dimension Badge

How to Cite

“A COMPARATIVE DERMAL MICRODIALYSIS STUDY OF DICLOFENAC QPS VERSUS CONVENTIONAL 1% DICLOFENAC GEL”. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research, vol. 5, no. 4, Oct. 2013, pp. 175-8, https://doi.org/10.25004/IJPSDR.2013.050408.

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

“A COMPARATIVE DERMAL MICRODIALYSIS STUDY OF DICLOFENAC QPS VERSUS CONVENTIONAL 1% DICLOFENAC GEL”. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research, vol. 5, no. 4, Oct. 2013, pp. 175-8, https://doi.org/10.25004/IJPSDR.2013.050408.