PRESCRIPTION TRENDS OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSANT DRUGS IN INDIAN RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS

Authors

  • Dharmik D Patel School of Pharmacy, R K University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
  • Ketan P Modi B K Modi government college, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
  • Anil K Patel Consultant Nephrologist Care Hospital, Surat, Gujarat, India

Abstract

The present study was conducted to find out the changes in immunosuppressant drug prescription pattern and trends in kidney transplant patients. In this study 613 Indian transplant patients who underwent kidney transplantation between July 2004 and June 2011 were enrolled. Various data of all transplant patients including immunosuppressant drug medication, changes in the prescription, use of antibody for induction and antirejection treatment were collected during their hospital stay and ambulatory visit. Antibody use as an induction agent has increased from during the study period. Induction was used in 23.1% during the year 2005 and increased to 44.4% during the year 2009. Among induction agent ATG was most commonly preferred agent, followed by daclizumab and basiliximab (24% ATG Vs 6.9% daclizumab Vs 6.9% basiliximab). Use of tacrolimus has increased (94% on tacrolimus vs 6% on cyclosporine in 2010). Mycophenolate mofetil is most commonly used antiproliferative agent (80% on MMF vs 20% on azathioprine in 2010). Trend is towards more use of MMF though azathioprine is being used in significant number of patients. Analysis of maintenance immunosuppression after renal transplant showed 60% patient maintained their original regimen over 7 years of follow up. Sirolimus was introduced in 1.5 to 7% patients during follow up period. Anti rejection treatment was required in 22-47% renal transplant recipients and trend towards decreasing rejection episode was seen. Steroids were used in the treatment of rejection in 90-100% patients. Use of ATG for treatment of rejection has increased from 11.5% in 2005 to 40% in 2010-11. By this study we conclude that immunosuppressant drugs have passed through significant changes during the year 2005 to 2011. Use of ATG as an induction agent and for treatment of rejection has increased. Similarly MMF and tacrolimus are most commonly used in maintenance regimen for renal transplant patients.

Keywords:

Immunosuppressant drug trends, Kidney transplant patients, Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25004/IJPSDR.2015.070405

References

1. Danovitch, Gabriel M. Handbook of Kidney Transplantation, 5th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Handbook.
2. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. American Journal of Transplantation. 2009; 9Suppl 3: S6–S9.
3. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. American Journal of Transplantation. 2009; 9Suppl 3: S16–S18.
4. Meier-Kriesche HU, Li S, Gruessner RWG, Fung JJ, Bustami RT, Barr ML, et al. Immunosuppression: Evolution in Practice and Trends, 1994–2004. American Journal of Transplantation. 2006; 6(Pt 2): 1111-31.
5. Stephen McDonald, Philip Clayton, Kylie Hurst, Australian Organ and Tissue Authority, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Kidney Health Australia. Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, 2012 Annual Report. 35th Ed. 2013.
6. Ahn C, Koo TY,Jeong JC, Kim M, Yang J, Lee J, et al. Initial Report of the Korean Organ Transplant Registry: The First Report of National Kidney Transplantation Data. Transplantation Proceeding. 2014; 46: 425-430.
7. Organ procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). OPTN/SRTR 2012Annual Data Report. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration; 2014.
8. Knoll GA, Bell RC. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine for immunosuppression in renal transplantation: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br Med J. 1999; 318: 1104-7.
9. Bansal SB, Saxena V, Pokhariyal S, Gupta P, Kher V, Ahlawat R, et al. Comparison of azathioprine with mycophenolatemofetil in a living donor kidney transplant programme. Indian J Nephrol. 2011; 21(4): 258-63.
10. Matas AJ, Smith JM, Skeans MA, Lamb KE, Gustafson SK, Samana CJ, Stewart DE, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2011 Annual Data Report: kidney. Am J Transplant. 2013; 13Suppl 1: 11-46.

Published

01-07-2015
Statistics
Abstract Display: 366
PDF Downloads: 465
Dimension Badge

How to Cite

“PRESCRIPTION TRENDS OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSANT DRUGS IN INDIAN RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS”. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research, vol. 7, no. 4, July 2015, pp. 334-9, https://doi.org/10.25004/IJPSDR.2015.070405.

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

“PRESCRIPTION TRENDS OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSANT DRUGS IN INDIAN RENAL TRANSPLANT PATIENTS”. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research, vol. 7, no. 4, July 2015, pp. 334-9, https://doi.org/10.25004/IJPSDR.2015.070405.