Formulation and Evaluation of Controlled Release Maintenance Dose Loaded Niosomes of Anti-Hypertensive Drug
Abstract
The present study was aimed to formulate, comparatively evaluate and optimize multiple lipid drug carriers of valsartan for oral controlled release to overcome the problems associated with the drug such as bioavailability, to reduce the dosage regimen, half life and to determine the appropriateness of niosomal formulation as a drug carrier. Ether injection method was chosen for the formulation of physically and chemically stable niosomes of valsartan. The formulation and process parameters were optimized by manufacturing placebo niosomes. Than drug loaded niosome was prepared by varying the concentration of span 60. The prepared nine formulations were evaluated for various parameters. Placebo niosomes were evaluated for appearance, odour, texture, creaming volume, pH and changes after 15 days. The medicated nine formulations were evaluated for organoleptic properties (appearance/color, odour), pH, total drug content, entrapment efficiency, mean particle size and polydispersibility index, zeta potential and In-vitro drug release. All formulations were off-white in color, odourless, and fluid in nature. It was stable and did not show sedimentation. The pH was found to be in the range of 4.6-5.4. Drug content was found in the range of 89.13 to 99.52. The Entrapment efficiency was found in range of 79.05 to 98.24. The mean vesicle size of drug loaded niosomes of the different batches ranged between 2.52-3.42μm. The polydispersvity index was in the range of 0.325 to 0.420 which indicates a narrow vesicle size distribution. The values of zeta potential were in the range of -20.29 mV to -30.55 mV which indicates that niosome had sufficient charge and mobility to inhibit aggregation of vesicles. All the nine formulations shows constant drug release in controlled manner up to 24 h. Formulation V7 was considered to be the best formulation as the % drug content (99.52 ± 0.97), % entrapment efficiency (98.24 ± 1.50) and % drug release at the end of 24th h (98.55) were high for V7. The optimized formulation V7 showed higher degree of correlation coefficient (r2) 0.9805 which indicates process of constant drug release from dosage form. The present study concludes that the prepared niosome is a convenient and efficiency carrier for the delivery of antihypertensive drug. Besides this, it provided controlled delivery of drug.
Keywords:
Niosomes, Valsartan, Ether injection technique, Vesicular size, Controlled drug deliveryDOI
https://doi.org/10.25004/IJPSDR.2019.110605References
Arora R, Sharma A. Release studies of ketoprofen niosome formulation. J Chem Pharm Res 2010;2(1):79-82.
Sharma SK, Chauhan M, Anilkumar N. Span-60 niosomal oral suspension of fluconazole: Formulation and in vitro evaluation. JPRHC 2009;1:142-56.
Pranshu T, Shaffi K. Niosomes: Formulation and Evaluation. Int J Biopharm, 2011; 2(1): 47-53.
Rogerson A, Cummings J, Willmott N, Florence AT. The distribution of doxorubicin in mice following administration in niosomes. J Pharm Pharmacol 1998;40:337-42.
Baillie AJ, Coombs GH, Dolan TF, Laurie J. Non-ionic surfactant vesicles, niosomes as delivery system for the anti-leishmanial drug sodium stribogluconate. J Pharm Pharmacol 1986;38:502-5.
Chauhan S, Luorence MJ. The Preparation of polyoxyethylene containing non-ionic surfactant vesicles. J Pharm Pharmacol 1989;41:6-10.
Blazek-Welsh AI, Rhodes DG. SEM imaging predicts quality of niosomes from maltodextrin-based proniosomes. Pharm Res 2001;18:656-61.
Nair AS, Vidhya KM, Saranya TR, Sreelakshy KR, Nair SC. Emulsomes: A novel liposomal formulation for sustained drug delivery. IRJPAS 2013;3:192-6.
Naresh RA Raja, GK Pillai, N Udupa, G Chandrashekar. Anti-inflammatory activity of niosome encapsulated diclofenac sodium in arthritic rats. Indian J Pharmacol 1994;26(1):46-8.
Khandare JN, Madhavi G, Tamhankar BM. Niosomes novel drug delivery system. The Eastern Pharmacist 1994;37:61-4.
Hunter CA, Dolan TF, Coombs GH, Baillie AJ. Vesicular systems (Niosomes and liposomes) for delivery of sodium stibogluconate in experimental murine visceral leishmaniasis. J Pharm Pharmacol 1988;40:161-5.
Malhotra M, Jain NK. Niosomes as drug carriers. Indian Drugs 1994;31:81-6.
Anil A, Thomas L, Sudheer P. Liquisolid compacts: An innovative approach for dissolution enhancement. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2018;10:11-7.
Prasanthi S, Vidhyavathi M. Formulation and optimization of buoyant in-situ gelling system of Valsartan using natural polymer. IJPPS 2017;10:128-36.
https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00177
Indian Pharmacopoeia: Government of India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. The Controller of Publications Delhi;2007.p.550,746.
Remington, Lippincott, Williams, Wilkins. The science and practice of pharmacy. 20th ed. Wolter kluwer company; 2002.p.691-3.
Cooper J, Gun C. Powder Flow and Compaction. Inc Carter SJ ed. Tutorial Pharmacy, New Delhi, hidix CBS Publishers and Distributors;1986.p.211-33.
Lachman L, Liberman HA, Kanig JL. The Theory and Practice of industrial Pharmacy. 3rd ed. Varghese Publishing House, Bombay;1987.p.297-300.
Klaus Florey: Analytical profiles of drug substances. 64th ed. Elsevier Academic press; 2005.p.327-44.
https://www.fda.gov>drugs>ucm286595
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov>appletter
Punitha S, Sravanthi C, Tananki G. Evaluation of Aceclofenac Niosomes Prepared By Various Techniques. IJPSRR 2012;16:75- 8.
Published

