PREPARATION AND EVALUATION OF INTRAORAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR RASAGILINE MESYLATE

Authors

  • Rama Bukka Nargund College of Pharmacy, II Main, Dattatreya Nagar, BSK III Stage, Bangalore-85, Karnataka, India
  • Kalyani Prakasam Nargund College of Pharmacy, II Main, Dattatreya Nagar, BSK III Stage, Bangalore-85, Karnataka, India
  • Chintan D. Patel Nargund College of Pharmacy, II Main, Dattatreya Nagar, BSK III Stage, Bangalore-85, Karnataka, India

Abstract

The aim of the present work was to prepare and evaluate a buccal film for intraoral delivery of Rasagiline. Formulations were prepared using 32 full factorial design to explore the effects of carbopol P 940 and sodium alginate (as independent variables) on mucoadhesive strength and drug release (as dependent variables). In addition to the above, the prepared films were also evaluated for surface pH, percentage moisture absorption (PMA), Percentage moisture loss (PML), folding endurance and content uniformity. The release profile data was subjected to curve fitting analysis to describe the release mechanism from the buccal films. The main effects and the interaction terms were quantitatively evaluated by quadratic model. The Rasagiline release was decreased with increase in both the polymers. Carbopol has more pronounced effect than sodium alginate on the mucoadhesive strength. The objective of the study is to optimize formulation with desirable mucoadhesive strength and drug release. The experimented values are in good agreement with expected values for the optimized formulation which demonstrate the feasibility of the model in the development of buccal film.

Keywords:

Rasagiline, buccal film,, Factorial design, intraoral drug delivery

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25004/IJPSDR.2010.020415

References

1. Ghosh TK, Pfister WR. Drug delivery to the oral cavity molecules to market. Taylor & Francis, 2005.
2. Ian WK. Modified Release Drug Delivery Technology: Oral mucosal Drug Delivery. Marcel Dekker Inc, 2003.
3. Amal EK, Madga S, Viviane N, Safaal AG. Chitosan and Soium alginate- Based Bioadhesive Vaginal Tablets. AAPS Pharmsci. 2002; 4(4): 224–230.
4. Vamsi VY, Ramesh G, Chandrasekhar K, Bhanoji RME, Madhusudana RY. Development and invitro Evaluation of buccoadhesive Carvidilol tablets. Acta pharm. 2007; 57:185-197.
5. Tee HK, Jae SA. A Novel Mucoadhesive Polymer Film Composed of Carbopol, Poloxamer and Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose. Arch Pharm Res. 2007; 30: 381-386.
6. Sean CS. Martindale. The complete Drug Reference. Pharmaceutical Press, 2009.
7. Fazlul H. Molecular modelling analysis of the metabolism of Rasagiline. Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2008; 3: 168-172.
8. Bhupinder S, Rajiv K, Naveen A. Optimizing drug delivery systems using systematic “Design of Experiments.” Part I: Fundamentals Aspects. Critical Reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems.2004; 22:27-105.
9. Patel VM, Prajapati BG, Patel MM. Design and characterization of chitosan-containing mucoadhesive buccal patches of propranolol hydrochloride. Acta Pharm. 2007; 57: 61-72.
10. Al-saidan SM, Krishnaiah YSR, Chandrasekhar DV, Lalla JK, Rama B, Jayaram B. Formulation of an HPMC gel drug reservoir system with ethanol-water as a solvent system and limonene as a penetration enhancer for enhancing in vitro transdermal delivery of nicorandil. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology. 2004; 17: 310-320.
11. Vishnu MP, Bhupendra GP, Madhabhai MP. Effect of Hydrophic polymers on Buccoadhesive Eudragit patches of Propronolol Hydrochloride using factorial design. AAPS PharmsciTech .2007; 8 :E1-E8.
12. Khanna R, Agrawal SP, Ahuja A. Preparation and evaluation of buccal films of clotrimazole for oral Candida infections. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1997; 59: 299-305.
13. Satish Babu BK, Srinivasan BP. Preparation and Evaluation of Buccladhesive Films of Atenolol. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2008; 70(2):175-179.
14. Alagasundaram M, Chengaiah B, Ramkanth S. Formulation and Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Buccal Films of ranitidine. International Journal of Pharm Tech Research. 2009; 1 (3):557-563.
15. Gupta A, Garg S, Khar RK. Measurement of bioadhesive strength of muco-adhesive buccal tablets: design of an in-vitro assembly. Indian Drugs. 1992; 30:152-155.
16. Raymond CR, Paul JS, Sian CO. Hand book of Pharmaceutical Excipients. Pharmaceutical Press, 2006.
17. John DS. The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2005; 57:1556-1568.
18. Bhupender S, Sukhwinder KC, Naveen A. Formulation and optimization of controlled release mucoadhesive tablets of Atenolol using Response Surface Methodology. AAPS Pharm SciTech. 2006; 7:E19-E28.
19. Narendra.C, Srinath MS, Prakash RB. Development of three layered buccal compact containing Metoprolol tartrate by statistical optimization technique. International Journal of Pharmaceutics.2005; 304:102-114.
20. Ikinic G, Senel S, Wilson C, Summu M. Development of a buccal bioadhesive nicotine tablet formulation for smoking sessation. Int.J.Pharm. 2004; 227:173-178.
21. Anil KS, Manish C, Amargit S. Potential Applications of Carbomer in oral Mucoadhesive Controlled Drug Delivery Systems: A Review. Drug Devepolment and Industrial Pharmacy.2000; 26:913-924.

Published

01-10-2010
Statistics
Abstract Display: 411
PDF Downloads: 423
Dimension Badge

How to Cite

“PREPARATION AND EVALUATION OF INTRAORAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR RASAGILINE MESYLATE”. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research, vol. 2, no. 4, Oct. 2010, pp. 294-01, https://doi.org/10.25004/IJPSDR.2010.020415.

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

“PREPARATION AND EVALUATION OF INTRAORAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR RASAGILINE MESYLATE”. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research, vol. 2, no. 4, Oct. 2010, pp. 294-01, https://doi.org/10.25004/IJPSDR.2010.020415.